Troy Unrau ([info]troy_at_kde) wrote,
@ 2007-06-18 17:56:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:kde presskit

Feedback requested on a Writer's Guide to go in the press kit
This short guide below is one of many short documents that we'll hopefully be putting inside the KDE 4.0 Press Kit to send to brick and mortar media outlets. Inside the press kit, it will appear as a single sheet with formatting that is different than the official KDE related materials in order to make it stand out in the reverse sense. I'm soliciting feedback on any items that this short document is missing, or need corrected.

[begin document]

An Informal Guide to Dealing with Open Source Culture (for
Writers)

This document is designed to provide a few informal tips to media outlets that
are new to writing about Open Source Software in general, and KDE more
specifically. Seasoned veterans may still find a few of these tips to be
useful.

  • Search out the defining features, rather than comparing to commercial
    products.
    Many people in the commercial world view open source projects
    exclusively as replacements for their Windows equivalents. While some
    projects exist that do precisely this, the vast majority have unique
    features that help to identify the program. Focusing on what makes the
    program unique will produce a better response.

  • Don't hesitate to contact the program developers directly.
    Direct contact often produces the best answers. Usually programs will
    have an "About" screen (in KDE, it's under the help menu) that lists the
    contact information for the programmers that were actually involved in the
    creation of that software. Most programmers are very happy to answer
    press questions, or will redirect your questions to someone who can better
    deal with the specific questions.

  • Informal language is best. Most open source programmers do not
    have a degree in business, journalism, etc. and will respond faster and with
    more details if they are approached as though the interview was taking place
    in a coffee house. If you ask formal questions, do not be put off by
    the informal response you may get in return. Ask for definitions of
    any jargon that you do not understand as some words, especially the word
    "Hacker", have very different meaning in the open source context.

  • Don't expect immediate responses. Many open source programmers
    are coding in their spare time and work elsewhere to pay the bills.
    They will usually respond, but you need to give them time.

  • Discover people's motivations. While some people work on free
    software for altruistic reasons, you will find that many do not. Many
    people are paid by a company to implement features that this company would
    find useful. Others simply find it an enjoyable hobby, and like being
    a part of the community. A person's motivation will often dictate what
    sort of programming they will do. If you discover what motivates a
    person or project, you will better understand their goals, which isn't
    always to compete with commercial software offerings...

  • Play up collaboration, not division. While arguments between Linus
    Torvalds and Sun's CEO may make the rounds in popular press, cooperation is
    the prevalent mode of operation within the open source world. Free
    software projects cover a wide range of applications, from web servers to
    games, and quite often there is more than one product being developed under
    so called 'co-opetition'. Since the source code is available, projects
    readily and freely borrow ideas from one another, and even though the
    implementation details may be different, standards are developed for
    communications, data formats, and so forth. Open source projects are
    often stricter adherents to interoperability standards than their commercial
    counterparts.



(Post a new comment)

Good points all around
(Anonymous)
2007-06-19 06:47 am UTC (link)
I think the 6 points you outlined are very short and to the point. I especially think the first one "Search out..." is very important

- Nikolaj

(Reply to this)

mention important misunderstandings?
(Anonymous)
2007-06-19 08:12 am UTC (link)
Maybe you should also mention another important misunderstanding:
Free Software =/ Freeware

You rightly talk about motivation (it's not only about hating microsoft or something, there's money to be made) and hackers (maybe just say it: a hacker writes software, a cracker breaks into computers). Maybe you can mention that co-opetition leads to more innovation - competition and cooperation are both crucial for that, and FOSS does a great job here.

/jospoortvliet

(Reply to this)

nice :-)
(Anonymous)
2007-06-19 09:09 am UTC (link)
Thumbs up for Troy! :-)

You nailed the communication issues down pretty well, and it was pleasant to read.

The one thing I wonder about; now every programmer write nice thoughtful responses. someones a response can be harsh, but fortunately the really good ones are able to 'see through the eyes of others too'. Perhaps something like this can be mentioned in the press kit too, in case someone gets a bad first impression?

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2007-06-19 04:06 pm UTC (link)
The only comments I would make are that some journalists may react to points 1 and 6 with a "who are you to tell me how to do my job" attitude, due to their phrasing.

For the first point, something like this might be better:

Search out the defining features. Many people in the commercial world view open source projects exclusively as replacements for their Windows equivalents. While some projects exist that do precisely this, the vast majority have unique features that help to identify the program.

(ie: scrap the second half of the first sentence, as well as the final sentence).

For the last point, changing the italicised sentence to something like "Remember that collaboration, not division, is the norm" would make it sound less like you were trying to preempt editorial decisions.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]troy_at_kde
2007-06-19 04:13 pm UTC (link)
Very useful comments - I will make some adjustments to the official copy of the document to reflect this. I'll leave the blog post the way it is that way people get a reference for your comment :) Gotta love the transient nature of the interweb :P

(Reply to this) (Parent)

questions, questions, questions
(Anonymous)
2007-06-19 05:01 pm UTC (link)
One little thing (I don't know how final the article already is, so I don't know if this correction is already appropriate): The last sentence of the second paragraph contains the word "questions" a bit too often, so maybe you could adjust that :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: questions, questions, questions
[info]troy_at_kde
2007-06-19 06:39 pm UTC (link)
Aha! good catch, and no it's not too late - I have until KDE 4.0 is released to finish this thing - but I have other things to do too :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…